Amelia Dyer: Inside the Horrifying Crimes of History’s Deadliest Baby Farmer
- D. Whitman

- Dec 1
- 4 min read
Updated: 4 days ago
A Killer Hidden in Plain Sight
Victorian England was a world of foggy streets, narrow alleys, crushing poverty, and rigid social rules that punished women for falling outside the lines. In this bleak landscape, a seemingly kind caregiver offered desperate mothers hope.
But behind the soft-spoken exterior was one of the most prolific serial killers in recorded history.
Her name was Amelia Dyer — and her weapon wasn’t a gun, a knife, or even poison.
It was trust.
The Chilling Discovery That Exposed a Monster
A Floating Parcel on the Thames
On April 30, 1896, a barge crew navigating the River Thames near Reading spotted a large brown package drifting through the murky water. Thinking it was trash, they pulled it aboard.
What they found instead stopped them cold.
Inside, wrapped in paper and tied tightly with twine, was the body of a baby girl. The cord had been wound several times around her tiny neck.
The handwriting on the wrapping was familiar to police.The twine was distinctive.
This discovery would unravel the horrifying crimes of Amelia Dyer, the woman later known as The Ogress of Reading.
Who Was Amelia Dyer?
A Childhood Marked by Madness and Abuse
Born Amelia Hobley in 1837, her early life was anything but normal:
A mother suffering severe mental breakdowns
Amelia forced to care for her during violent psychotic episodes
A cold, emotionally absent father
A home environment filled with fear and instability
These early traumas shaped a woman who learned how to mask her emotions — and exploit the emotions of others.
From Nurse to Baby Farmer
Amelia initially trained as a nurse, a profession rooted in compassion. But the work was exhausting, poorly paid, and offered no upward mobility.
Then Amelia discovered baby farming — a legal but loosely regulated Victorian practice where women took in infants from unwed or impoverished mothers for a fee.
Most baby farmers were negligent. Some were cruel.
But Amelia became something far worse.
Baby Farming: The Dark Business of Victorian Desperation
The Perfect Storm for Exploitation
Victorian society punished unwed mothers with:
Social ostracization
Loss of employment
Homelessness
Legal consequences under vagrancy laws
With no support systems, many turned to baby farmers who promised:
“Pay me, and I will raise your child.”
But raising a child was expensive.Profit came only if the child didn’t survive long.
Most baby farmers let starvation or disease do the killing.
Amelia Dyer cut out the waiting.
The Killing Begins
A System Designed for Murder
Amelia adopted dozens of aliases and moved frequently, each time placing advertisements promising safe homes and loving care.
But the truth was devastating:
She never sought adoptive families
She took the money and kept the babies only briefly
Many children died within hours or days
Bodies were secretly disposed of
Her early method was poisoning via Godfrey’s Cordial, an opium-based syrup commonly given to infants to keep them quiet — often fatally so.
When coroners became suspicious, Amelia changed her approach.
The White Tape Murders
She began strangling the babies with white dressmaking tape, later telling authorities:
“You’ll find no baby cries where I’m going.”
First Arrest — and a Deadly Comeback
In 1879, Amelia was arrested — but only for child neglect. She served a short sentence of hard labor.
This near-miss taught her a valuable lesson:
If she moved constantly and used different names, authorities struggled to track her.
And so the killings accelerated.
She became more organized.More mobile.More efficient.More deadly.
The Mother Who Brought Her Down
The Case of Evelina Marmon
In 1896, a young mother named Evelina Marmon gave her newborn daughter, Doris, to Amelia. Evelina was desperate, unmarried, and believed Amelia’s promises of a loving adoptive home.
But Evelina grew suspicious and saved every letter Amelia sent.
Those letters later helped police connect the dots.
And when the baby girl found in the Thames was identified as Doris Marmon, detectives began to watch Amelia closely.
Inside Amelia Dyer’s House of Horrors
When investigators raided Amelia’s Reading residence, the scene was beyond disturbing.
They found:
Heaps of baby clothing
Adoption advertisements
Ledgers, receipts, and financial records
Letters from desperate mothers
Spools of white dressmaking tape
The smell of decay lingering in the walls
Neighbors told police the house was filled with crying babies one day… and eerily silent the next.
Police realized:
Dozens of infants entered the home.Very few ever left.
How Many Babies Did Amelia Dyer Kill?
Officially, investigators could only tie a few dozen murders directly to her.
But far more were suspected:
Many infants never recorded
Bodies disposed of in rivers, fields, and trash heaps
Multiple identities and aliases obscuring records
Coroners rarely performing full examinations on infant deaths
Conservative estimates place the death toll at 300 babies.Some historians argue the number could exceed 400, making her one of the most lethal serial killers in history.
Arrest, Trial, and Execution
Amelia Dyer was arrested on April 4, 1896.
Her trial lasted just five days.
The prosecution needed only one proven murder — the death of little Doris Marmon — to convict her.
On June 10, 1896, Amelia Dyer was hanged at Newgate Prison.
Her final words:
“I have nothing to say.”
The Legacy of a Monster
The horror of Amelia Dyer’s crimes forced major reforms in England:
Stronger infant protection laws
Improved adoption oversight
Increased social support for vulnerable mothers
A public reckoning with the dangers of unregulated childcare
But the full story of her victims remains incomplete.
Hundreds of infants — unnamed, unrecorded, unclaimed — vanished without proper burial or justice.
Their only memorial is the dark legacy Amelia left behind.
Tales of the Twisted.The Strange. The Weird. The Bizarre.
For more cinematic true-crime stories and eerie real-world mysteries, subscribe to the Tales of the Twisted podcast and step deeper into the shadows.


Comments